Meeting notes (16/12/2019, ADJMT)

  • T: news – narrow band, extraction ispired by PolyFit
  • T: current priority is to improve the extraction cost (Chamfer distance?)
  • D: is twisting a problem? T: Probably ok for now
  • A: why do we need fitting and coverage terms in PolyFit? Seems like it’s redundant. T also lacks intuition.
  • D: can we try PolyFit coverage term in 1D?
  • M: merge tangent + fitting terms together
  • A: to start, we can penalize the number of selected edges for the coverage term
  • J: is current hex mesh sufficient? T: we can play with parameters and hope for the best (nb size etc.)
  • D: harmonic or biharmonic frame field? T: Biharmonic might be better (curved corner example)
  • next meeting: send mail beginning of January

ToDo

  • implement better extraction costs: two-sided distance of the input edges and the output edges

3d drawing datasets

Bowl experiments – extraction